To this
day, Dr. Laura Laffrado has only found one negative review of Ella Higginson's
work since she began the Ella Higginson Recovery Project. However, for years Dr.
Laffrado was unsure what exactly the review said, as the only reference to it
was in a 1935 letter Higginson wrote to Alfred Powers (1887-1983, an Oregon author
and journalist). It was not until a few months ago that the
actual review was located.
The author of the review is unknown, but since it was printed in The Washington Standard of Olympia, Washington, it can be assumed they were local. The object of the review was Higginson's poem "Hate" which appears in the collection of her poetry When the Birds Go North Again (1898). The review, titled "A Fiendish Malediction" and published August 24, 1900, reprints "Hate" and goes on to critique the piece and its author. Transcription below:
"Hate" as it appears in Ella Higginson's When the Birds Go North Again (1898).
To those who have
attributed to women those gentler instincts which mould the actions of humanity
into deeds of kindness and love, the foregoing quotation from a little volume
published by Ella Higginson, of New Whatcom, entitled "When the Birds Go
North Again," gives a rude shock. It causes a chill of horror to run down
the spine at the sudden realization of the fact that even the better half of
humanity may be as destitute of character as the bloodthirsty savage; assuming
of course, that poets always portray their heart-throbs when they take the
world into confidence, and that Truth twangs the strings of their empassioned
lyres.
Such
hatred as the fair authoress professes is not creditable, and it is not fair to
ascribe it to others if not seriously entertained by herself. It is not of
heaven nor of earth, and can only find a habitation in the regions of the
damned, and be held by those unforgiven and unforgivable creatures, who glory
in a hatred so intense that they hope it will last throughout eternity.
An
then temerity and irreverence manifested by taking into her defiant confidence
One of all others whose nature beams with forgiveness and love; one who came on
earth and died to inculcate the doctrine of love, forgiveness and fraternity,
peace on earth and goodwill among men. She prays—not in His name surely—that a
fellow being, on her own judgement, may be sent to the "deepest
hell," and that the awful fires may "slowly do their part," so
as to inflict the most exquisite, lasting and horrible torments. This seems so
hellish (the proper word, dear reader,) it challenges belief that a human being
could have deliberately given expression to such cruel sentiment.
It
is safe to say that if good old St. Peter ever catches a glimpse of that little
poem, Ella will never enter the pearly gates. She will be compelled to finish
out such profound hating "to all eternity," at New Whatcom, or in
Hades, for nobody with such a lump in her throat will be allowed to enter the
kingdom of heaven.
It's little wonder that
Higginson would recall this over three decades later due to its damning nature.
The review is fraught with ideas from the culture of domesticity, perpetuating the
concept that women are inherently more moral than men (“the better half of
humanity”) and that it is their duty to be moral guardians of the household and
society. In a single column, the
author of the review has attacked Higginson’s femininity, accused her of
personally harboring “hellish” hate for a woman in her community, claimed that
she could not possibly pray to the Christian God, and will ultimately be barred
from heaven upon her death.
The review as it appears in The Washington Standard on August 24, 1900.
However, the review
points out its own flaw: the reviewer has confused the narrator of the poem
with the author of the poem (“assuming of course, that poets always portray their heart-throbs”). The narrator is the author’s own
construction, just as the lines of the poem are. Another review of “Hate” does
not make this mistake, declaring that When
the Birds Go North Again is worth owning for this poem alone, but agrees
that if the poem were inspired by the genuine hatred of real person Higginson
knew, then to publish it would be “improper” (pg. 430, The Book Buyer, vol XXV,
1903).
In her letter to Alfred Powers,
35 years after the publication of the review, Higginson finally addresses it: “I
have never publicly answered a criticism of my work; but I wish now to answer
many bitter and ignorant criticisms of one of my poems—"Hate," in my
volume "When the Birds Go North Again." How any one could read in
that poem that it is I speaking is entirely beyond my understanding.”
The letter explaining "Hate" written to Alfred Powers by Ella Higginson, 9 June 1935. A full transcription is available at the bottom of this post.
Higginson reveals to
Powers the origin of the poem, writing how she was inspired after seeing
actress Fanny Davenport (1850-1898) in her most famous role as the Queen of Egypt
in the English translation of French playwright Victorien Sardou’s Cleopatra:
Many
years ago, in Chicago, I saw Fanny Davenport play "Cleopatra." There
was a scene in which, lying prone upon a couch, she watched through a screen,
a love-scene between Antony and Octavia. Her portrayal of a woman consumed with
jealousy was so powerful that I was deeply impressed thereby, and the poem
formed itself in my mind; and upon my return to my hotel, I made the first
rough draft of it at once. It was first published under the title of
"Cleopatra."
It's unknown exactly when
Higginson saw the production, but that she saw it during a trip to the East
coast in 1891. Once on tour, the show played at the
Columbia Opera House in Chicago December 7-12, 1891 after a run first in New
York City and then in Boston. Fanny Davenport, the daughter of two successful
theatrical artists, produced, directed, and starred in Cleopatra, whose script had not previously been performed in
English. The show, declared by the press as the theatrical highlight of the year, was worth
$50,000 (over $1.3 million today), had a chorus of over 120 members, and used
five real snakes in the performances.
Fanny Davenport as Cleopatra, New York City, December 1890.
The scene which inspired
the poem was Act IV, Scene V. Cleopatra secretly listens to a conversation
between her lover Antony and the young Octavia. In the script, Antony tells
Octavia how he prefers her youth and chastity to Cleopatra’s maturity and
sexual experience. He compares Cleopatra to a ghost in the night and Octavia to
the brilliance of the dawn. The scene leaves Cleopatra “overwhelmed” and “destroyed”
and she weeps furiously before exiting the stage.
“When it
was included in my book, a critic advised me to name it "Hate,"
because it was the most powerful description of that devastating passion he had
ever read,” Higginson writes of the poem. A draft of
the poem kept in the Washington State Archives Bellingham branch sports the
original title.
A draft of "Hate" on onionskin paper, courtesy of the Ella Higginson Papers, Center for Pacific Northwest Studies, Heritage Resources, Western Washington University, Bellingham WA.
If Higginson had kept “Cleopatra”
as the title, this misunderstanding would have been
avoided and the damning yet hilarious review never written. At the close of the letter, she reiterates how foolish it was for the
reviewer to assume that Higginson was writing from a place of personal truth: “I
wrote a "murder" story once, also a "murder" poem, both in
the first person; but have not, as yet, been accused of that crime!”
🍀
A full transcription of the letter to Alfred Powers by Ella Higginson, 9 June 1935:
If you can ever give
this publicity, I'll be grateful.
I have never publicly
answered a criticism of my work; but I wish now to answer many bitter and
ignorant criticisms of one of my poems—"Hate," in my
volume "When the Birds Go North Again." How any one could read in
that poem that it is I speaking is entirely beyond my understanding.
Many
years ago, in Chicago, I saw Fanny Davenport play "Cleopatra." There
was a scene in which, lying prone upon a couch, she watched through a
screen, a love-scene between Antony and Octavia. Her portrayal of a woman
consumed with jealousy was so powerful that I was deeply impressed thereby, and
the poem formed itself in my mind; and upon my return to my hotel, I made the
first rough draft of it at once. It was first published under the title of
"Cleopatra." I believe in "foreordination," and I think it
was that which made me keep that first draft, bearing that title—and which has
long been in the possession of Edith B. Carhart, head of the Bellingham Public
Library.
When it
was included in my book, a critic advised me to name it "Hate,"
because it was the most powerful description of that devastating passion he had
ever read.
I wrote a
"murder" story once, also a "murder" poem, both in the
first person; but have not, as yet, been accused of that crime!
What a full and detailed blog post! I love the rich context you provide for the poem: the background on Davenport and the production of Cleopatra, the reviews, the letter to Powers, and the fantastic photographs! It's easy to see why Higginson would have been captivated!! Thanks for this excellent post! ✍🏽✍🏽✍🏽
ReplyDelete